OIC-IPHRC categorically condemns Sri Lanka’s enactment of discriminatory laws under the pretext of ‘deradicalization’ and ‘counter terrorism’ prompting arbitrary arrests, torture and banning of burqa as tantamount to grave deprivations of human rights of Muslim minorities and violative of Sri Lanka’s international human rights obligations.

Jeddah 29th April 2021: The Independent Permanent Human Rights Commission (IPHRC) of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) joins the international community in strongly condemning the Sri Lankan Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) and its recently enacted regulation namely ‘De-radicalization from holding violent extremist religious ideology’, which allows creation of “Reintegration Centers” to arbitrarily detain Muslims and subject them to torture and other human rights violations without any legal oversight with impunity. These tragic developments are further compounded by reports of newly imposed Burqa ban, under the pretext of counter terrorism measures, which squarely violates minorities’ right to freedom of religion guaranteed in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).


The Commission, while taking serious note of the UNHCHR report[1], which highlighted the prevalence of “endemic patterns of custodial deaths, torture and other ill-treatment, and extrajudicial killings with impunity” and that COVID-19 pandemic “exacerbated the prevailing marginalization and discrimination suffered by the Muslim community”, urged the Sri Lankan government to immediately repeal the draconian PTA and to impartially investigate the reported incidents of human rights violations by allowing access to justice and free trial to all its minorities.

With regards to the banning of Burqa, the Commission expressed its serious concerns and stressed that such blanket measures would: (a) violate the Muslim women’s freedom to manifest their religion (ICCPR Art. 18(1); and exercise their choice for identity as guaranteed under (ICCPR: Art. 17(1); (b) expose them to religious discrimination (ICCPR: Art. 2(1), Art. 26); and (c) violate the rights of its minorities ‘to enjoy their own culture, and to profess and practice their own religion’ (ICCPR Art. 27). Such discriminatory measures will also cement negative stereotypes against Muslim women, disproportionately restrict their freedom to manifest their religion, cause intersectional discrimination and greater marginalization as well as stoke undue hostility / physical violence because of their clothing, it added.

The Commission concluded that such a majoritarian rhetoric and discriminatory measures are contrary to the ideals of pluralism, counterproductive to societal cohesion and clear manifestations of Islamophobia. It, accordingly, urged the Sri Lankan Government to fulfill its international human rights obligations by ensuring to protect the rights of its Muslim minority to practice their religion, free from any coercion or discrimination. The Commission also urged the (a) Sri Lankan Muslim community and human rights organizations to exhaust all available domestic remedies including domestic courts for redressal of grievances and repeal of discriminatory laws; and (b) international community to engage with Sri Lankan authorities to seek redressal for the aggrieved minority including by punishing those found guilty as per international human rights law.

[1] Report of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to the U.N. Human Rights Council, A/HRC/46/20, at paragraphs 31-36 (Jan. 27, 2021), https://undocs.org/A/HRC/46/20

Disclaimer :

Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect World Forum for Sri Lankan Muslims (wfslm.org) point-of-view.

About wfsm

Check Also

“Good Governance the bedrock of a stable nation”. The role of the Sri Lankan Muslim expatriates. by Mass L. Usuf

Keynote address by Mass L. Usuf, Attorney at Law at the Conference of the World …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *